What unfolds when immense wealth clashes with significant political power?
The world may soon witness just that.
A simmering disagreement between Elon Musk and Donald Trump escalated dramatically this week, culminating in a very public and acrimonious falling out. Both possess considerable influence and have leveraged their platforms to attack each other.
In Oval Office remarks, Trump sounded like a disgruntled former ally, expressing surprise at Musk’s criticism of his economic policies and downplaying Musk’s past support. He suggested Musk’s change of heart stemmed from potential impacts on Tesla due to Republican efforts to curtail electric vehicle subsidies.
Musk responded on X with characteristic brevity, stating he was unconcerned about subsidies and prioritizing debt reduction. He further asserted that the Democrats would have won last year’s election regardless of his contributions, labeling Trump’s reaction as “ingratitude.”
The billionaire then launched a series of pointed attacks, including unsubstantiated allegations linking Trump to unreleased documents related to Jeffrey Epstein. The BBC has contacted the White House for comment.
Musk and Trump previously enjoyed a powerful, albeit unlikely, alliance. Musk held a significant role in Trump’s administration, leading the Department of Government Efficiency (“Doge”), which oversaw substantial agency closures and staff reductions. However, their eventual rift had been widely anticipated.
Despite earlier predictions, their relationship persisted longer than expected. Trump remained supportive even as Musk’s popularity waned, and the two continued to interact regularly. Musk’s 130-day term concluded recently with an apparently amicable farewell.
That cordial ending appears to be a distant memory. Trump’s comments now explicitly acknowledge the past tense in their relationship.
Speculation arose that Trump’s recent announcements, including a travel ban and investigations, were diversions from Musk’s criticism. The White House seemed cautious initially, but Trump’s subsequent remarks changed that.
The dispute’s implications are far-reaching. Congressional Republicans may face challenges maintaining unity on Trump’s agenda with Musk’s potential financial and rhetorical support for dissenters.
Trump, known for his combative style, is likely to retaliate. The status of Musk’s allies within the administration and government contracts related to his companies remain uncertain, as do ongoing investigations.
Trump ominously declared his intention to terminate Musk’s subsidies and contracts on his social media platform.
Such actions could significantly harm Musk, as evidenced by Tesla’s 14% stock drop on Thursday. Yet, Musk possesses substantial resources to counterattack, including potentially funding political opponents of Republicans in upcoming elections.
Democrats are observing the situation cautiously, uncertain about re-engaging with Musk despite his past donations. However, the strategic benefits of exploiting this rift are clear.
“It’s a zero-sum game,” noted Democratic strategist Liam Kerr. “Anything he does that helps Democrats hurts Republicans.”
For now, the Democrats seem content to watch the spectacle unfold, allowing the conflict to dominate the political narrative.
This feud’s longevity is undeniable. Musk himself declared on X, “Trump has 3.5 years left as president, but I will be around for 40-plus years.”
The judge called the rapper’s actions “absolutely unacceptable” after he nodded and made faces at the jury.
Some may ask if Mark Rutte’s proposal to deter Russian aggression has at least a little to do with appeasing the US president, writes Jonathan Beale.
Trump’s proposed 3.5% tax on remittances by foreign workers could seriously impact top recipient India.
Families react to the delay of the trial of a Libyan man accused of making the bomb that destroyed Pan Am flight 103.
This is the first meeting between both leaders since Friedrich Merz won the election on 6 May.