Keir Starmer has affirmed his commitment to proceeding with the government’s planned welfare reforms, despite a significant rebellion among Labour backbench MPs.
Over 120 Labour MPs have joined an effort to block proposed cuts to disability and sickness benefits, aiming to prevent £5 billion in annual savings by 2030.
This potential rebellion poses a substantial threat, potentially negating the government’s parliamentary majority.
Addressing reporters before a NATO summit, the Prime Minister characterized the current welfare system as “unsustainable” and in need of reform.
When asked about pausing the reforms in light of the rebellion, Sir Keir stated his intention to “press ahead”.
He argued that the existing system traps individuals on benefits and contributes to unsustainable increases in taxpayer costs.
He highlighted the projected annual rise in Personal Independence Payment (PIP) claims, noting it’s “equivalent to the population of a city the size of Leicester”.
He challenged those concerned with the future of welfare to address the question of sustainable reform.
Regarding potential reliance on Conservative votes, he expressed uncertainty about their intentions and actions.
The Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill, scheduled for a vote next Tuesday, would tighten eligibility for PIP for individuals with less severe conditions.
Rebel Labour MPs have submitted a “reasoned” amendment that, if selected and approved by the Speaker, could halt the bill’s progress.
Their opposition cites projected increases in relative poverty, insufficient consultation, and inadequate impact assessments on employment.
While the amendment’s success is uncertain, the significant number of Labour backbenchers supporting it highlights the scale of the potential rebellion.
Labour MP Dame Meg Hillier, who tabled the amendment, urged the government to heed this “groundswell of opinion” and reconsider.
Dame Meg, chair of the Treasury Select Committee, criticized the government’s communication, citing confusion and exclusion of Labour experts from the process.
A key amendment coordinator (remaining anonymous) told the BBC that the government’s U-turn on winter fuel payment cuts emboldened signatories.
They noted MPs’ previous negative experiences with similar votes and the reluctance to repeat such a controversial decision.
The amendment’s origins are linked to Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall’s conciliatory offer extending the PIP transition period from four to thirteen weeks.
Subscribe to our Politics Essential newsletter for continuous updates on Westminster and beyond.
This challenge over benefit cuts represents a potentially critical juncture for the Prime Minister.
Senior Labour figures among MPs supporting the amendment could derail welfare reform.
Scotland may benefit strategically across multiple sectors.
A Labour minister highlights a ten-year strategy to create jobs and lower energy bills.
A councillor faces disciplinary action over past social media posts.