“`html
Rishi Sunak has testified that, while not all jobs could be preserved during the Covid-19 pandemic, the government successfully averted mass unemployment.
The former prime minister, who served as chancellor at the time, acknowledged that “it wasn’t going to be possible to save every person’s job.”
However, he asserted that the government “was successful in preventing mass unemployment,” and the pandemic’s impact on employment proved “considerably better than what anyone had forecast at the early stages.”
Sunak also stated that there was “not a playbook” for addressing the economic shock caused by Covid, as ministers were “dealing with something no one had dealt with before.”
The former PM was providing evidence to the public inquiry into the pandemic on Monday, answering questions about the policies implemented to support workers’ incomes and sustain businesses.
He explained that at the crisis’s onset, there was an “enormous amount of uncertainty,” with policymakers and experts unsure of the virus’s scale and duration, as well as how the population would respond to government-imposed measures.
“There was not a toolkit, there was not a playbook that you could pull of the shelf that said this is how you tend to deal with pandemics in the same way you somewhat have with other economic shocks or financial shocks,” he said.
For the past three weeks, the inquiry has examined the economic response to the pandemic, hearing from former ministers, treasury officials, and central bankers.
A key finding from the Covid inquiry last month indicated that the government did not treat the virus with sufficient seriousness until it was “too late,” with February 2020 deemed a “lost month” for action.
Sunak’s appearance on Monday marked his second time giving evidence, having previously testified in December 2023 while still prime minister.
He was appointed chancellor in Boris Johnson’s government on February 13th, and was preparing to present a Budget before the pandemic reached the UK and the country entered lockdown a month later.
Sunak told the inquiry that preventing mass unemployment was a priority, and that “speed was paramount” in the government’s response.
He said there was an “acknowledgement” in the Treasury that they were not going to “get everything right straight away”.
“We could not let perfect be the enemy of the good,” he said. “We had to get things out fast.”
Sunak said it was not possible “to save every person’s job”, but said that “as it turned out, the impact on living standards particularly for the most vulnerable in society… were stronger that I would have perhaps anticipated going into this and I’m very proud of that”.
The coronavirus job retention scheme, known as furlough, was announced by Sunak in March 2020.
During his previous appearance before the inquiry, Sunak defended his Eat Out to Help Out policy, a government initiative designed to support businesses reopening after the initial lockdown.
Sunak also informed the inquiry that medical officials advised him not to intervene “too early” when the pandemic struck.
“Especially in those early conversations, a lot of what the medical and scientific community were advising us at that time was not to go too early with the various interventions, because they were worried about public acceptance of them,” he said.
The furlough scheme was the centrepiece of Sunak’s intervention in the UK economy, designed to stave off a wave of job losses as the country closed down in the face of the virus.
Richard Wright KC, counsel to the inquiry, said hearings to date had received “generally positive evidence” in relation to the policy.
Sunak said that after the original scheme was rolled out, the government drew up a targeted version of it which “never saw the light of day”.
“We spent an inordinate amount of time over the summer iterating a more targeted version of furlough; hours and hours of work to do exactly that, on the basis that we were moving to a different phase of the pandemic,” he said.
“We did develop something called JSS (Jobs Support Scheme) which never saw the light of day because we had another lockdown.”
Sunak added there “wasn’t a way of targeting that I felt comfortable with”.
Asked to respond to criticism that the furlough scheme could have been shorter or longer, the former chancellor said: “I think this is something where we have to be really careful about hindsight”, but added he believed the approach was balanced correctly.
“If this thing happens again, it’s not obvious to me that there’s some learning from that period that would make it easier for someone in my position to make that balance,” he said.
On support for self-employed workers, Sunak said there were challenges with the scheme, given that those applying had to self-certify.
But he said it was right to support self-employed people and that he would “do it again” if in the same position.
At the end of 2024, Keir Starmer announced key government targets including on NHS waiting lists and building new homes, how is he getting on?
How to identify whether you have cold, flu or Covid and how to look after yourself.
Theo, from Doncaster, talks about the importance of financial education in schools.
Families of two women who died in hospital have questioned the use of “do-not-resuscitate orders”.
The impact of the JLR cyber-attack continued to affect output, while analysts say spending was hit by Budget uncertainty.
“`