President Trump’s actions toward Harvard University over the past week represent a significant escalation of tensions. On Monday, he threatened to redirect $3 billion in research funding to vocational schools. This was followed on Tuesday by a White House directive to federal agencies to review roughly $100 million in Harvard contracts and seek alternative vendors. Further pronouncements on the matter ensued on Wednesday.
“Harvard’s got to behave themselves,” he stated to reporters in the Oval Office. “Harvard is treating our country with great disrespect, and all they’re doing is getting in deeper and deeper and deeper.”
These actions, coupled with prior administrative efforts – including the freezing of over $3 billion in research grants and the suspension of foreign student enrollment – constitute a direct challenge to one of America’s most prestigious and affluent institutions of higher learning.
Even if legal challenges successfully overturn some of these directives – some are already temporarily blocked – the impact on American higher education is undeniable.
“They’re taking multiple actions daily, some slipping through unnoticed,” observes Greg Wolfson, president of the American Association of University Professors. “More importantly, they’re altering the cultural landscape and influencing people’s perspectives.”
Harvard’s recent commencement ceremony saw palpable student concern, according to attendees.
“People were aware of Trump’s attempts, but shocked when they materialized,” confided a British graduate who requested anonymity due to visa concerns. “It feels like a nuclear option.”
“If this can happen to Harvard, it can happen to any university,” they added.
However, the implications extend far beyond a single Ivy League institution. Some analysts suggest Trump’s actions represent the latest, and most ambitious, attempt by conservatives to weaken traditional pillars of Democratic Party support.
If so, university campuses have become a critical battleground shaping America’s cultural and political future.
The administration has offered varied justifications, including perceived conservative underrepresentation among Harvard’s faculty, concerns over the number of foreign students, and alleged financial ties to China.
The White House, however, cites the university’s purported failure to adequately address campus antisemitism following anti-Israel protests as the most immediate cause.
In December 2023, three prominent university presidents, including Harvard’s then-president Claudine Gay, faced intense criticism for their responses regarding whether calls for the “genocide of Jews” violated student conduct codes. Dr. Gay later apologized, stating, “When words amplify distress and pain, I don’t know how you could feel anything but regret.”
During last year’s campaign, Trump pledged to cut federal funding and accreditation for colleges perceived as promoting “antisemitic propaganda,” a promise he began fulfilling upon his return to office.
Several universities, including Columbia, agreed to significant changes in campus security and stricter oversight of relevant academic departments following high-profile protests.
In April, Harvard released a task force report (commissioned pre-election) on antisemitism and anti-Muslim bias, acknowledging bias faced by Jewish and Muslim students.
However, administrative demands extend beyond addressing antisemitism. A “Joint Task Force to Combat Anti-Semitism” letter detailed extensive changes, including terminating diversity programs, reforming admissions and hiring practices, screening foreign students for views deemed hostile to “American values,” and bolstering “viewpoint diversity” among students and faculty.
Trump’s aggressive approach has shocked many in higher education.
“It’s not about higher education,” argues Mr. Wolfson. “Higher education is a lever they see as critical to transforming society.”
The potential for long-term transformation hinges on whether universities comply or resist, as Harvard is attempting.
While Harvard is the most visible target, it’s not alone. Princeton and the University of Pennsylvania have reported research grant suspensions, and the Department of Education has launched antisemitism investigations into ten universities, with dozens more under potential scrutiny. Fifty-two universities are also under investigation for alleged illegal race-based programs.
Some view this as a broad assault on elite higher education to reshape universities into a more conservative image; others disagree.
“Universities aren’t about knowledge, but forcefully pushing a left-wing worldview,” Charlie Kirk of Turning Point USA stated on Fox News. “We’re here to shake it up.”
Conservatives have long viewed campuses as bastions of liberal indoctrination, citing various movements throughout history.
Polling data reveals a significant partisan divide. Civiqs polling shows non-college graduates are nearly split on Trump’s performance, while college graduates overwhelmingly disapprove.
“This blowback stems from universities becoming identified with Democratic America,” suggests Rick Hess of the American Enterprise Institute.
Hess notes higher education’s increased reliance on government funding, arguing that Trump’s administration is simply intensifying control mechanisms employed by previous Democratic administrations.
“In classic Trump fashion,” he adds, “these levers are turned up to eleven,” with fewer procedural safeguards than under previous administrations.
“It’s both an evolution and a revolution,” Hess concludes, arguing that universities contributed to this by becoming overtly political.
“The price for billions in taxpayer dollars is honoring commitments, like civil rights law, and serving the entire nation,” Hess emphasizes.
Withholding federal funding represents a novel challenge, but some see it as the latest attempt by conservatives to undermine liberal power.
Through legislation and court rulings, labor union influence has diminished, curtailing Democratic Party resources. Lawsuit reform has limited trial lawyer contributions, and government workforce reductions have eroded another Democratic base.
Wolfson, however, fears broader losses if Trump’s actions are upheld.
“Multiracial, multicultural, multinational universities are a boon, creating diverse communities and intellectual thought,” he points out.
Harvard is using the courts to resist, successfully suspending a foreign student visa ban. A lawsuit against federal grant terminations is pending.
“The trade-off is clear: allow government micromanagement or jeopardize breakthroughs and innovation,” Harvard’s complaint states.
President Garber defended Harvard’s commitment to education and truth, emphasizing its longstanding service to the nation.
Trump countered, “Harvard wants to fight, and they’re getting their ass kicked.”
While Trump’s base supports his actions, polls suggest a majority of Americans favor universities and oppose funding cuts. The practicality of fundamentally reshaping higher education remains a daunting task.
Wolfson warns of damage to academic independence, even with potential court intervention.
“The destruction is real,” Wolfson asserts. “Even if courts intervene, there’ll be massive undermining of higher education due to Trump’s reckless moves.”
Hess is less concerned, believing Trump’s approach may prove less effective than methodical restructuring.
“This is an ambitious experiment,” Hess concludes. “Whether it succeeds remains to be seen.”
Regardless of outcome, American universities are no longer shielded from political conflict. The ivory tower’s walls have been breached.
Top image credit: Getty Images
BBC InDepth is the home on the website and app for the best analysis, with fresh perspectives that challenge assumptions and deep reporting on the biggest issues of the day. And we showcase thought-provoking content from across BBC Sounds and iPlayer too. You can send us your feedback on the InDepth section by clicking on the button below.